Amplifi is a good system with a refined app, just can't handle a complex network the way Eero can. Short answer - I have used and tested both systems and Eero is MUCH faster with a full device load. I recently moved one of my two Eero remote units to a more straight-line location from the gateway Eero about 45 ft away, and I am getting 270-300 Mb/s connecting my iMac to that remote node via ethernet. I found the Beacons are a good 25% slower in throughput speeds than the regular second-gen Eeros I seldom exceed 150-160 mb/s or so on them, so now I just use the three Eeros. I get 200-230 Mb/s at both remote nodes with wireless PC connections. /rebates/2fobject-storage-e22fspeed-test-for-idrive-e2-vs-wasabi-backblaze-b2-s3&. Connections Multi Single Use Speedtest on all your devices with our free native apps. With only a handful of clients logged in, the Amplifi HD even with one unit has surprisingly good range and I got nearly 300 Mb/s 40 ft away, but with the network saturated it dropped by two-thirds.Įero easily does double that with the three regular Eero 2nd gen units (not Beacons) I have set up now in a wireless mesh with a fully loaded network. Speedtest by Ookla - The Global Broadband Speed Test Go Results Settings Microsoft Azure 157.55.39.220 Finding optimal server. Downdetector only reports an incident when the number of problem reports is significantly higher. It is common for some problems to be reported throughout the day. This chart shows a view of problem reports submitted in the past 24 hours compared to the typical volume of reports by time of day. I have lots of devices - currently well over 80 - and the Amplifi system could not give me more than 110-120 Mb/s internet speeds (service is 300 Mb/s) at the two satellite locations, wired or wireless, with all clients on the network. Backblaze outages reported in the last 24 hours. I have tried and used both systems: I bought three Amplifi HD routers and meshed them together.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |